IMDB Synopsis:
Three film students go missing after traveling into the woods of Maryland to make a documentary about the local Blair Witch legend leaving only their footage behind.
Three film students go missing after traveling into the woods of Maryland to make a documentary about the local Blair Witch legend leaving only their footage behind.
That's the faux documentary that I'm talking about, The Curse of the Blair Witch.TGM wrote:I thought the ending was disappointing, and I remember being more creeped out the documentary that came out a few weeks before (perhaps on the Sci Fi channel?) that discussed the history of the Blair Witch, and the "found footage" of the missing hikers. That was really well done. The movie itself, not so much.
TGM wrote:LOL, obviously I do not read your posts.
Can you blame her? She was hoping to get back to her husband and kids alive.Alien Redrum wrote: The lady I was with was terrified.
I had a very different theater experience on opening night, packed midnight showing. About half loved it, the other half were disappointed. I was one of the latter. In fact I don't think there was one person in the group that I saw it with (about 8 of us) who didn't feel let down somewhat.Neon Maniac wrote:Can you blame her? She was hoping to get back to her husband and kids alive.Alien Redrum wrote: The lady I was with was terrified.
I had a similar movie theater experience with this. Silent. Shock. Relief at the end when it was over. For everyone who said they hated this movie, they're either lying or didn't see it in the theater.
The build up was amazing to this movie, and that is the hype that I think most people are referencing. Not the post-release hype. The story surrounding the movie and the marketing are the far more interesting elements.I thought the ending was disappointing, and I remember being more creeped out the documentary that came out a few weeks before (perhaps on the Sci Fi channel?) that discussed the history of the Blair Witch, and the "found footage" of the missing hikers. That was really well done. The movie itself, not so much.
I have to disagree because the film has So Much Hype around it. It was absolutely brilliant marketing. I will always defend it that it made the money it did because it was a good movie. Yes, the hype absolutely helped it, but I get so tired of the argument that the only reason it did as well as it did was because of hype. That's just retarded. But the hype hurt it as much as it helped, as it got to a point where there was no way it could live up to the expectations.shiki-jitsu wrote:The build up was amazing to this movie, and that is the hype that I think most people are referencing. Not the post-release hype. The story surrounding the movie and the marketing are the far more interesting elements.
Kind of like my feelings on Texas Chain Saw Massacre (a thread in which you should re-read. ).Still, it was an important movie for the horror genre. And is clearly extremely influential and will continue to be so. I can appreciate the film for those reasons. I just wish it came together better.
That probably has a lot to do with your hatred of the film, the fact that you can't relate to it. Like I find Rosemary's Baby to be extremely overrated, and not because a baby fucker directed it. Ohhhhhhhh hooded people. So scarrrrrrrryyyyyyyy. Woooooooohhhhhhhhhh.DJBenz wrote:OK, now I'm at a computer and not on my phone, I'll give my thoughts on BWP. I hated it, naturally, and the first time I saw it was on TV. Some might say that I've lost out because I didn't have the cinema experience, but I don't believe that. A great film should transcend its media, making it irrelevant. Like the B&W film you forget is monochrome, or the foreign film you forget is subtitled because the film is so encompassing. It didn't happen here, basically because BWP doesn't tap into any primal fears I have. Really, piles of rocks and stick men aren't scary. I read Stick Man to my kids each night if that point needs to be proven.
For all its silliness, I found Insidious far creepier, especially the scene where the guy comes downstairs to find the front door open. There's a primal fear explored; the last barrier between the safety of your home and the nasties that might lurk outside thrown open with the uncertainty whether anything got in.
I did actually find the ending a little creepy. It was about the only part of the film where I was elevated from piss-boiling rage to something approaching appreciation for anything that appeared on screen,
You'd be surprised. I've had arguments about it on this very board. It's stupid.I don't think anyone accuses BWP of ripping off Cannibal Holocaust, people who think that accusation is leveled are retarded. There is (was?) a huge amount of fanboy masturbation over how 'original' the concept was, when Holocaust had done it years previously. If you want to accuse BWP of ripping off CH then I guess it ripped off the concept and, unfortunately, steered the genre to churn out endless found footage horrors. Man Bites Dog? Nope, not seeing that, unless it's the 'documentary' POV.
The girl gets annoying, yeah, but I can't knock them for it. on a $35,000 budget, you aren't getting any sort of profile actors. You probably aren't even getting SAG.Finally, the characters killed it for me. I fucking longed whinging, shrieking cunt of a lead actress to just die and get the fuck off my screen. If I'd had the camera I'd have dropped it, picked up a rock from one of the non-scary piles and stoved her fucking head in with it.