Horror Movie Discussion #60 - Psycho (1960)

General horror discussion. Movies, DVDs, Blu-rays, TV, and Podcasts.

Any good?

Highly recommended
4
67%
Recommended
1
17%
Rent it
0
No votes
Skip it
0
No votes
Not seen it
1
17%
 
Total votes: 6

User avatar
Alien Redrum
Services No Longer Needed
Services No Longer Needed
Thanks:
Posts: 11849
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 9:36 am
Anti-Spam Question: No
Location: Somewhere trying to cancel you.
Contact:

Horror Movie Discussion #60 - Psycho (1960)

Post by Alien Redrum »



Image




IMDB Synopsis:
A thirty-something secretary steals $40,000 from her employer's client, and subsequently encounters a young motel proprietor too long under the domination of his mother.
(Suggested by Neon)
Follow Horror DNA on Twitter.

I'm thinking I might make one to keep in the trunk of the car though. Might be nice to have hot water if I ever have to watch a Matthews compound for 3-4 days hoping to get the drop on Sergio Frenchi. - Neon Bolan

User avatar
Alien Redrum
Services No Longer Needed
Services No Longer Needed
Thanks:
Posts: 11849
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 9:36 am
Anti-Spam Question: No
Location: Somewhere trying to cancel you.
Contact:

Re: Horror Movie Discussion #60 - Psycho (1960)

Post by Alien Redrum »

It's not my favorite of Hitchcock's (I'm probably one of the few that actually likes The Birds more because it has better dialog), but this one is still brilliant. Highly recommended.
Follow Horror DNA on Twitter.

I'm thinking I might make one to keep in the trunk of the car though. Might be nice to have hot water if I ever have to watch a Matthews compound for 3-4 days hoping to get the drop on Sergio Frenchi. - Neon Bolan

User avatar
shiki-jitsu
Horror DNA Hardcore
Horror DNA Hardcore
Thanks:
Posts: 4478
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 2:01 pm

Re: Horror Movie Discussion #60 - Psycho (1960)

Post by shiki-jitsu »

Alien Redrum wrote:It's not my favorite of Hitchcock's (I'm probably one of the few that actually likes The Birds more because it has better dialog), but this one is still brilliant. Highly recommended.
You probably think Family Plot is great too. :jack:

Psycho is not his best (that would go to either Shadow of a Doubt, Rebbeca or Rear Window... all stronger than Psycho IMO), but it is a damn fine movie. Definitely one of his best films.

If you haven't seen this. Do it now.
Letterboxd

"Ghost hunters are the romance novels of tv" - Neon Maniac

User avatar
Alien Redrum
Services No Longer Needed
Services No Longer Needed
Thanks:
Posts: 11849
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 9:36 am
Anti-Spam Question: No
Location: Somewhere trying to cancel you.
Contact:

Re: Horror Movie Discussion #60 - Psycho (1960)

Post by Alien Redrum »

No, fuck Family Plot. But The Trouble with Harry is awesome, I'll tell you that. :yay:
Follow Horror DNA on Twitter.

I'm thinking I might make one to keep in the trunk of the car though. Might be nice to have hot water if I ever have to watch a Matthews compound for 3-4 days hoping to get the drop on Sergio Frenchi. - Neon Bolan

User avatar
Neon Maniac
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Thanks:
Posts: 11233
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 5:17 am
Anti-Spam Question: No
Location: Out making America great again

Re: Horror Movie Discussion #60 - Psycho (1960)

Post by Neon Maniac »

I don't see this as a Hitchcock film, to tell you the truth. Rear Window, Vertigo, etc. are Hitchcock films. This is a Bloch film made by Hitchcock. I liked the movie until I read the book, then I loved both. This is something all horror fans really need to see.
:facts:

Because AR doesn't take my posts seriously

User avatar
DJBenz
Site Admin
Site Admin
Thanks:
Posts: 2644
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 9:30 am
Anti-Spam Question: No
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Horror Movie Discussion #60 - Psycho (1960)

Post by DJBenz »

shiki-jitsu wrote:If you haven't seen this. Do it now.
I haven't seen this in such a long time it's almost like I haven't seen it. I guess I should revisit it.
Horror DNA on the web: www | Facebook | Twitter | YouTube | Instagram

User avatar
Alien Redrum
Services No Longer Needed
Services No Longer Needed
Thanks:
Posts: 11849
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 9:36 am
Anti-Spam Question: No
Location: Somewhere trying to cancel you.
Contact:

Re: Horror Movie Discussion #60 - Psycho (1960)

Post by Alien Redrum »

Neon Maniac wrote:I don't see this as a Hitchcock film, to tell you the truth. Rear Window, Vertigo, etc. are Hitchcock films. This is a Bloch film made by Hitchcock. I liked the movie until I read the book, then I loved both. This is something all horror fans really need to see.
Are you sure you read the book? The characters are night and day.

I didn't really like Bloch's Norman. He wasn't scary or creepy at all. He was just a loser.
Follow Horror DNA on Twitter.

I'm thinking I might make one to keep in the trunk of the car though. Might be nice to have hot water if I ever have to watch a Matthews compound for 3-4 days hoping to get the drop on Sergio Frenchi. - Neon Bolan

User avatar
walls
Wallsbot
Wallsbot
Thanks:
Posts: 840
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 2:17 am
Anti-Spam Question: No
Location: Fortress of Solitude

Re: Horror Movie Discussion #60 - Psycho (1960)

Post by walls »

I saw the frame by frame remake, does that count?

19itmicmac
Emerging from the grave.
Emerging from the grave.
Thanks:
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 7:06 pm
Anti-Spam Question: No

Re: Horror Movie Discussion #60 - Psycho (1960)

Post by 19itmicmac »

One of Hitchcock's best, I would only put Vertigo and Rear Window ahead of it.

User avatar
shiki-jitsu
Horror DNA Hardcore
Horror DNA Hardcore
Thanks:
Posts: 4478
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 2:01 pm

Re: Horror Movie Discussion #60 - Psycho (1960)

Post by shiki-jitsu »

walls wrote:I saw the frame by frame remake, does that count?
Jesus Christ. No. :umm:
Letterboxd

"Ghost hunters are the romance novels of tv" - Neon Maniac

User avatar
Neon Maniac
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Thanks:
Posts: 11233
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 5:17 am
Anti-Spam Question: No
Location: Out making America great again

Re: Horror Movie Discussion #60 - Psycho (1960)

Post by Neon Maniac »

Alien Redrum wrote:
Neon Maniac wrote:I don't see this as a Hitchcock film, to tell you the truth. Rear Window, Vertigo, etc. are Hitchcock films. This is a Bloch film made by Hitchcock. I liked the movie until I read the book, then I loved both. This is something all horror fans really need to see.
Are you sure you read the book? The characters are night and day.

I didn't really like Bloch's Norman. He wasn't scary or creepy at all. He was just a loser.

Yes, I'm sure I read the book. Apparently I may have understood it a little better than some other people who may have read the book. I really wouldn't call it night and day. Anthony Perkins really nailed the role, and like the great actor he was, he made Norman all his own. I think you may have read the book and not appreciated it because the gimmick was already ruined for you.
:facts:

Because AR doesn't take my posts seriously

User avatar
Neon Maniac
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Thanks:
Posts: 11233
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 5:17 am
Anti-Spam Question: No
Location: Out making America great again

Re: Horror Movie Discussion #60 - Psycho (1960)

Post by Neon Maniac »

shiki-jitsu wrote:
walls wrote:I saw the frame by frame remake, does that count?
Jesus Christ. No. :umm:
Give him a break, wallsbot has a limited life span. He doesn't have time to watch every movie. Blonde's poor programming skills made wallsbot choose the wrong one to watch. He can't help that. Blame Blonde.
:facts:

Because AR doesn't take my posts seriously

User avatar
Alien Redrum
Services No Longer Needed
Services No Longer Needed
Thanks:
Posts: 11849
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 9:36 am
Anti-Spam Question: No
Location: Somewhere trying to cancel you.
Contact:

Re: Horror Movie Discussion #60 - Psycho (1960)

Post by Alien Redrum »

Neon Maniac wrote:
Alien Redrum wrote:
Neon Maniac wrote:I don't see this as a Hitchcock film, to tell you the truth. Rear Window, Vertigo, etc. are Hitchcock films. This is a Bloch film made by Hitchcock. I liked the movie until I read the book, then I loved both. This is something all horror fans really need to see.
Are you sure you read the book? The characters are night and day.

I didn't really like Bloch's Norman. He wasn't scary or creepy at all. He was just a loser.

Yes, I'm sure I read the book. Apparently I may have understood it a little better than some other people who may have read the book. I really wouldn't call it night and day. Anthony Perkins really nailed the role, and like the great actor he was, he made Norman all his own. I think you may have read the book and not appreciated it because the gimmick was already ruined for you.
Did you really just use the "you didn't get it" argument? :lol:
Follow Horror DNA on Twitter.

I'm thinking I might make one to keep in the trunk of the car though. Might be nice to have hot water if I ever have to watch a Matthews compound for 3-4 days hoping to get the drop on Sergio Frenchi. - Neon Bolan

User avatar
Neon Maniac
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Thanks:
Posts: 11233
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 5:17 am
Anti-Spam Question: No
Location: Out making America great again

Re: Horror Movie Discussion #60 - Psycho (1960)

Post by Neon Maniac »

Alien Redrum wrote:
Did you really just use the "you didn't get it" argument? :lol:
Yes I did! Kudos to you good sir for seeing it for what it was!

:lol:
:facts:

Because AR doesn't take my posts seriously

User avatar
shiki-jitsu
Horror DNA Hardcore
Horror DNA Hardcore
Thanks:
Posts: 4478
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 2:01 pm

Re: Horror Movie Discussion #60 - Psycho (1960)

Post by shiki-jitsu »

Alien Redrum wrote:
Did you really just use the "you didn't get it" argument? :lol:
Looks like someone finally got it.
Letterboxd

"Ghost hunters are the romance novels of tv" - Neon Maniac

Post Reply